Friday, November 30, 2012

Cr3+-Doped Fluorides and Oxides: Role of Internal Fields and Limitations of the Tanabe–Sugano Approach

This work is aimed at clarifying the changes on optical spectra of Cr3+ impurities due to either a host lattice variation or a hydrostatic pressure, which can hardly be understood by means of the usual Tanabe–Sugano (TS) approach assuming that the Racah parameter, B, grows when covalency decreases. For achieving this goal, the optical properties of Cr3+-doped LiBaF3 and KMgF3 model systems have been explored by means of high level ab initio calculations on CrF63– units subject to the electric field, ER(r), created by the rest of the lattice ions. These calculations, which reproduce available experimental data, indicate that the energy, E(2E), of the 2E(t2g3) → 4A2(t2g3) emission transition is nearly independent of the host lattice. By contrast, the energy difference corresponding to 4A2(t2g3) → 4T1(t2g2eg1) and 4A2(t2g3) → 4T2(t2g2eg1) excitations, Δ(4T1; 4T2), is shown to increase on passing from the normal to the inverted perovskite host lattice despite the increase in covalency, a fact which cannot be accounted for through the usual TS model. Similarly, when the Cr3+–F distance, R, is reduced both Δ(4T1; 4T2) and the covalency are found to increase. By analyzing the limitations of the usual model, we found surprising results that are shown to arise from the deformation of both 3d(Cr) and ligand orbitals in the antibonding eg orbital, which has a σ character and is more extended than the π t2g orbital. By contrast, because of the higher stiffness of the t2g orbital, the dependence of E(2E) with R basically follows the corresponding variation of covalency in that level. Bearing in mind the similarities of the optical properties displayed by Cr3+ impurities in oxides and fluorides, the present results can be useful for understanding experimental data on Cr3+-based gemstones where the local symmetry is lower than cubic.

Cr3+-Doped Fluorides and Oxides: Role of Internal Fields and Limitations of the Tanabe–Sugano Approach. A. Trueba, J. M. García-Lastra, P. Garcia-Fernandez, J. A. Aramburu, M. T. Barriuso, and M. Moreno. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2011 115 (46), 13399-13406

No comments: